I have no problem with paying coaches who make things happen, but the problem is that this more pay than any female faculty at the university makes. I'm not trying to get all feminist on here, (but I could) but these are the facts. Pam Benoit, the Vice President and Provost, is second in line at the university. Benoit is in charge of the university's finances and holds a key role in shaping the university's priorities. This makes her the second most influential person at Ohio University. Despite this her base salary is $250,000 per year with a $15,000 expense allowance. Added together she still receives about $90,000 less than John Groce and about $235,000 less than the university was reportedly offering Groce to keep him in Athens.
At a college that is facing a potential $5 million shortfall, and that is that is talking about raising tuition 3.5 percent in the next year, is it smart to spend that much more on a coach than a top administrator? I'm not talking about killing the athletic budget. I love going to a District I college that is eligible for bowl games, as well as March Madness, but I don't think that we can put the burden on students while athletics get's a free pass. 75 percent of the athletic budget comes from student fees. While students are paying more for tuition, the budget for athletics and their administration has also risen. And despite the money coming in, Ohio is still being sited for not being compliant with Title IX because of discrepancies in funding and facilities.